We have in the event of November 22, 1963, the most important assassination of the Twentieth Century, and a radical reset from a quest for peace to a rush to war.
DiEugenio in Reclaiming Parkland states the two major lies of the event are 1) Oswald shot Kennedy; 2) LBJ merely continued JFK's Vietnam War.
Let us look at the first which was used to accomplish the war.
Dulles and McCloy with Ford the commissioner-informant actively framed Oswald, as does Bugliosi, without trial.
We have in Sherry Fiester's Enemy of the Truth the closest thing to an expert witness for the defense in the trial which was denied America
I stipulate it is comprehensive, credible and compelling, if not definitive and final.
The alternatives are examined and dismissed as they do not satisfy observed phenomena per present professional protocol.
The oft repeated lie that Oswald killed Kennedy is paralleled by the mischaracterization of Sirhan the hypnotized decoy as the assassin
Thomas Noguchi as presented in Turner and Christian as well as Klaber and Melanson (also O'Sullivan) demonstrates the four shots into the candidate or his clothing were right to left, down to up, back to front, point blank: a position never occupied by Sirhan but describing Ace Securtiy Guard Thane Eugene Cesar (whose H & R 922 satisfies the acoustic signature of five of the thirteen shots on the audio tape)
We have fifty to eighty witnesses to the avulsive occipitoparietal wound at the right, from the entry at the right temple/hairline, the hole seen by some of the physicians, described to Kilduff by Perry, described by Robinson the mortician, emanating fragments, causing radial and concentric fracturing, producing kinetic transfer and backspatter
at Z-313 when the president's head was twenty-five degrees left, plotted in the vehicle on the street aiming a cone of trajectory at the South Knoll
coincidentally the area determined by Anthony DeFiore for a throat shot at Z-225 in his 300-page analysis
Without Noguchi we have only a vague sense of the true trajectory
as with the head shot of the president absent the professional analysis of the certified expert
The Goebellsian Lie that Oswald killed Kennedy is a myth we must do away with
Recall that Robert Ruark in writing of the Mau Mau uprising against British Rule in Something of Value cites the Bantu proverb:
"If you do away with the traditions of the past, then you must first replace them with Something of Value"
We replace the Sirhan frame with the Noguchi professional analysis
and the Oswald frame with the Fiester professional analysis
It is not necessary to speculate in either case
Blaming and framing Sirhan and Oswald is entirely unsupportable
These are matters as devastating for the status quo as Copernicus' insight in his day
A nation stumbling along following a myth is in great danger of falling for the next one
